Russian court may assume exclusive jurisdiction despite objections by Russian party (Eleventh Commercial Appellate Court of Russia)

In Case No A55-10205/2026, the Eleventh Commercial Appellate Court of Russia ruled that a Russian court may assume exclusive jurisdiction over a dispute, even if the Russian party is the defendant and objects to the case being considered in the Russian courts. Authors: Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Anna Domnikova (Junior Associate), KK&P Trial Lawyers […]
In detail

Russian court declines to hear claim of major state-owned bank because of existence of arbitration agreement (Commercial Court of St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region)

In Case No A56-24289/2025, the Commercial Court of St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (the Russian court) declined to hear the claim of the PJSC VTB Bank (VTB) against JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (JPM) because of the existence of a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement. Authors: Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Anna Domnikova (Junior associate), […]
In detail

Russian Supreme Court publishes review of court cases on sanctions-related disputes

On 19 June 2026, the Russian Supreme Court (SC) published Review No 8/2026 on sanctions-related disputes (Review), which includes several important provisions that may restrict access to arbitration with Russian parties. Authors: Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Maria Ivanova (Associate), KK&P Trial Lawyers The Review notes that, if a dispute is connected with sanctions or […]
In detail

Russian Supreme Court Publishes New Review on Sanctions-Related Disputes: KK&P Analysis for Global Arbitration Review

On 19 June 2026, the Supreme Court of Russia (the SCR) published Review of Court Practice No. 8/2026 On Russian Countersanctions and Sanctions-Related Disputes (the Review). The Review summarises the SCR’s approach to a number of issues that have been at the centre of Russia-related litigation over the past several years and are of particular […]
In detail

Russian court refuses award-debtor’s application to recognise and enforce an LCIA award

In Case No A21 4252/2026, the Commercial Court of the Kaliningrad Region refused to recognise and enforce an LCIA award. Unusually, it was the award-debtor that applied for recognition and enforcement, arguing that it needed the decision to seek a Russian permit to pay sums owed under the award. Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Maria […]
In detail

Russian court reconsiders decision and refuses interim relief in support of LCIA arbitration (Moscow City Court)

In Case No 33-16033/2026, the Moscow City Court reconsidered a previous decision and refused interim relief in support of an LCIA arbitration. Authors: Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Maria Ivanova (Associate), KK&P Trial Lawyers The LCIA arbitration is related to the non-payment by the buyer of software (respondent) from the seller (claimant). The claimant applied […]
In detail

Russian court considers investor’s claim against Norway, bypassing the rules on Norway’s immunity and applicable investment treaty (Commercial Court of the Kursk Region)

In Case No A35-6794/2023, the Commercial Court of the Kursk Region (Court) has determined that it had jurisdiction to consider a claim falling within the scope of an arbitration provision in the Norway-Russia BIT (BIT). Authors: Maxim Kulkov (Managing partner) and Maria Ivanova (Associate), KK&P Trial Lawyers A Russian investor brought a claim against Norway […]
In detail

Practical Law has published updated KK&P annual legal reviews

KK&P Managing Partner Maxim Kulkov and Senior Associate Luiza Movsisyan updated for Practical Law an overview of mediation and amicable settlements in arbitration and civil litigation in Russia. Annotation to the review “Mediation: Overview (Russian Federation)”: A Practice Note providing an overview of the key legal issues that need to be considered, from a Russian law perspective, when mediating […]
In detail

Russian court recovers EUR7.5 billion penalty for anti-arbitration injunction violation in ECT arbitration (Commercial Court of Moscow)

In Russian Prosecutor General v Wintershall and others (Case No А40-92702/2025), the Commercial Court of Moscow (CCM) granted an application by the Russian Prosecutor General to recover EUR7.5 billion from a German investor, its counsel and the arbitral tribunal for violating an anti-arbitration injunction. The court also ruled that a DIFC Court order, granting an […]
In detail